AM Best Upgrade: How Insurer Ratings Affect Institutional Gold Holdings

Why AM Best’s Michigan Millers Mutual Upgrade Matters for Institutional Gold Exposure

Hook: Institutional investors, portfolio managers and trustees who track insurer-linked credit risk face a recurring headache: rating changes can silently rewire an insurer’s asset allocation — including allocations to bullion or gold ETFs — and shift the true exposure inside insurance-linked products. The Jan. 2026 AM Best upgrade for Michigan Millers Mutual is a timely case study on how insurer creditworthiness influences reserve assets and what you should do now to protect portfolio exposure.

Fast takeaways

• On Jan. 16, 2026 AM Best upgraded Michigan Millers Mutual’s Financial Strength Rating to A+ and its Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating to aa-, citing strongest balance sheet strength and strong operating performance (Insurance Journal / AM Best).
• Rating changes affect an insurer’s cost of capital, reinsurance terms and permissible asset strategies under statutory accounting — all of which can change allocations to alternatives like gold ETFs or bullion holdings.
• For investors in insurance-linked products, the upgrade is a sell- or hold- signal only after you review the insurer’s investment policy, RBC position, reinsurance affiliations (e.g., the “p” pooling code tied to Western National) and recent filings.

The Michigan Millers upgrade: what AM Best said and why it matters

AM Best’s Jan. 2026 action extended Western National’s ratings to Michigan Millers after Michigan Millers joined Western National’s pooling agreement effective Jan. 1, 2026. AM Best cited the insurer’s strongest balance sheet strength, strong operating performance, and appropriate enterprise risk management. The upgrade also reflected significant reinsurance support and the assignment of a “p” reinsurance affiliation code linking Michigan Millers to Western National.

"These rating assignments follow a regulatory approval and reflect the participation of Michigan Millers as a member in the pooling agreement of Western National…"

Translation for investors: Michigan Millers gained capital and operational support through pooling, reducing its standalone credit risk. That lowers counterparty risk for counterparties and investors and changes the insurer’s room to maneuver in asset allocation.

How insurer creditworthiness shapes asset allocation (short answer)

Insurers don’t allocate assets the same way pension funds or mutual funds do. The combination of statutory accounting rules (NAIC in the U.S.), reserve and capital requirements, liability-matching imperatives, and rating agency criteria drives a conservative bias: high-quality fixed income, cash and short-term investments predominate. But ratings matter — here’s how:

• Cost of capital: Higher FSR/ICR reduces perceived credit risk and borrowing costs, which can free surplus to be allocated to return-enhancing or inflation-hedging assets (including gold ETFs or limited direct bullion positions under alternatives mandates).
• Reinsurance and pooling: Stronger group support (as with Western National) changes net retained risk, often allowing an insurer to reduce conservative capital buffers and re-direct assets to diversify.
• Regulatory treatment and RBC: Certain asset classes attract higher charges under NAIC RBC rules. A stronger rating can lead to less conservative internal capital buffers above RBC minimums.
• Liquidity & duration management: If ratings free up liquidity lines or reduce expected margin calls, insurers may accept lower liquidity but higher diversification (e.g., commodity ETFs or active strategies that include gold exposure).

Where gold fits in an insurer’s portfolio in 2026

Gold is rarely a core statutory reserve asset for life or property/casualty insurers because it doesn’t produce cash flow. However, in 2025–2026 several structural trends increased institutional interest in gold as a hedge and a liquidity-preserving store of value:

• Persistent inflation surprises in parts of 2024–2025 led to renewed hedging demand.
• Greater macro volatility and tapering liquidity across global fixed income markets prompted some insurers to add liquid alternative exposures.
• Improved custody and ETF infrastructures lowered operational friction for institutional gold allocations (allocated vs unallocated, segregated custody, insured vaults).

Consequently, insurers that have strong balance sheets and favorable ratings increasingly use small, tactical allocations to gold via:

• Physical bullion held in segregated segregated vaults for strategic reserves (rare; subject to severe regulatory and accounting review).
• Gold ETFs (GLD-like) used for liquid, transparent exposure — easier to hold in statutory portfolios and to monetize for liquidity needs.
• Derivatives and futures for hedging inflation-linked liabilities or managing short-term tactical exposure.
• Gold mining equities or commodity-focused strategies embedded in alternatives sleeves for return-seeking portions of surplus.

Why the upgrade can trigger real changes to portfolio exposure

When AM Best upgrades an insurer, multiple channels transmit to portfolio composition:

1. Capital reoptimization: An A+ / aa- rated insurer has a wider capital cushion to fund diversification strategies — that can open the door to small allocations into gold ETFs or commodities to hedge inflation risk.
2. Improved reinsurance economics: Better ratings can lower reinsurance costs or expand reinsurance capacity, which reduces retained capital requirements and can free surplus for alternative allocations.
3. Market perception: Counterparties and investors may view the insurer as a safer issuer. That narrows spreads on insurance-linked securities (ILS) and potentially reduces the yield premium insurers seek, altering their investment return targets and asset mix.
4. Regulatory signaling: Ratings upgrades can prompt regulators and boards to revisit investment policy statements (IPS) and allow pilot allocations to liquid alternatives.

Concrete scenarios: How the Michigan Millers upgrade could play out

Below are plausible, concrete moves an insurer in Michigan Millers’ position might make — and why they matter to investors with exposure to insurer products.

Scenario A — Tactical gold exposure via ETFs

With upgraded ratings and access to pool support, Michigan Millers could authorize a small tactical allocation (0.5%–2.0% of surplus) to a highly liquid gold ETF. This offers:

• Quick liquidity if capital is needed for claims.
• Transparent daily NAVs suitable for statutory reporting.
• Lower custody/insurance overhead than physical bullion.

Investor impact: If you own ILS or annuities tied to the insurer, your indirect gold exposure increases slightly. That exposure is liquid and market-priced, so it can help in inflationary stress but won't meaningfully change default risk.

Scenario B — Alternatives sleeve with gold futures

Alternatively, Michigan Millers may expand an alternatives mandate to add gold futures for hedging — lower capital outlay, high liquidity, but introduces derivative counterparty risk. The insurer’s stronger rating reduces counterparty fears and margin stress.

Investor impact: Derivative positions are generally off-balance sheet in certain filings; investors should check Schedule DB and derivative footnotes in statutory filings to quantify exposure.

Scenario C — No material change

Conservative insurers may maintain status quo: keep liabilities matched to high-quality bonds. The upgrade then simply lowers counterpart-credit risk for counterparties and reduces systemic risk pricing for ILS products.

What investors should do now: practical steps

Use the Michigan Millers upgrade as a template — not an isolated signal. Here are practical, actionable steps for portfolio managers, trustees, and institutional investors who hold insurance-linked products or are evaluating insurer counterparties.

1. Review statutory filings: Pull the insurer’s latest NAIC annual statement and Schedule BA (investment schedule). Look for gold ETF, derivative or commodity allocations and note changes quarter-over-quarter.
2. Check RBC and surplus trends: Rating upgrades often move RBC multiples and surplus levels. A rising surplus can be a precursor to more adventurous asset choices.
3. Read reinsurance disclosures closely: The “p” pooling code and reinsurance affiliations (Western National in this case) materially alter net retention and asset strategy. Lower retention often means more flexibility.
4. Monitor insurer investment policy statements (IPS): Request or source the IPS. Policy language restricting commodities or non-income assets may still block gold holdings despite stronger ratings.
5. Quantify indirect gold exposure: For ILS holdings, compute the effective allocation to gold by mapping insurer portfolios to product exposures. Don’t rely solely on net asset values — examine footnotes.
6. Set exposure triggers: Create rules to act on rating changes (e.g., if AM Best FSR moves to A+ or higher, reduce counterparty haircut by X% or re-price credit cushions accordingly).
7. Engage in counterparty due diligence: For large allocations, demand collateral, segregation of assets and copper-bottom custody arrangements for bullion or ETF holdings.
8. Watch for market signaling: An upgrade can tighten spreads on insurer-issued ILS. Consider rebalancing if the yield differential compresses and your portfolio licensing requires return targets.

Checklist for auditors, trustees and compliance teams

• Confirm whether gold exposures are in statutory admitted assets or surplus.
• Verify custody arrangements and insurance for physical bullion holdings.
• Validate counterparty credit limits for ETF providers and prime brokers (if futures used).
• Update scenario stress tests: model gold price moves alongside claims shocks and interest rate changes.
• Record any change in investment policy or board minutes that reference the rating change.

Signals that a rating change is material to investor exposure

Not every upgrade will alter portfolio risk. Prioritize action when multiple signals line up:

• Upgrade + pooling/reinsurance link: As with Michigan Millers, the extension of group ratings via pooling can be structural, not cosmetic.
• Public statement of asset policy changes: Watch press releases and board minutes for explicit permission to explore alternatives.
• Large surplus build: Rapid surplus growth suggests the insurer may accept modest allocations to non-traditional assets.
• Regulatory nods: Any supervisory comment or approved plan tied to reinsurance changes is a higher signal than a mere ratings action.

Advanced strategies: hedging and opportunistic trades for allocators

Institutional allocators can use AM Best actions as trade triggers:

• When an insurer’s rating improves, short-term tightening of ILS spreads may offer a roll-down trade: sell ILS exposure now if your models suggest spreads will compress and reinvest in higher-conviction credit elsewhere.
• If the insurer adds gold ETFs to its portfolio, consider overlay strategies that hedge downside in commodity prices — or use the insurer’s enhanced balance sheet to source structured products with gold-linked coupons.
• Use options to synthetically replicate small gold allocations where insurers’ internal policies block direct holdings. This is useful for capturing hedge benefits without changing statutory asset mixes.

Risk considerations and limitations

Be realistic about what a rating upgrade means:

• A rating upgrade reduces counterparty and credit risk but does not eliminate operational, liquidity or market risks.
• Gold allocations are typically small and tactical in insurer portfolios; don’t assume a dramatic shift in default probability because of a small tactical gold position.
• Statutory reporting lags mean public filings may not reflect intrayear tactical trades — engage directly with insurer investor relations for up-to-date exposure data.

2026 trends to watch going forward

Several macro and industry trends in 2026 will determine whether upgrades like Michigan Millers’ lead to sustained changes in insurer allocations to gold and other alternatives:

• Interest rate normalization: If global rates remain higher and more volatile, insurers may lean into inflation hedges.
• Capital market volatility: Continued bond market dislocations could push insurers toward liquid commodity ETFs as diversification.
• Regulatory evolution: NAIC and international regulators may update treatment of commodities and ETFs in statutory capital tests.
• Operational infrastructure: Improved custody, insurance and audit trails for bullion and ETFs make gold more palatable for institutional balance sheets.

Final recommendations — what to do in the next 30/90/180 days

1. Next 30 days: Pull Michigan Millers’ latest NAIC filings, read AM Best rationale, and update your counterparty watchlist. If you hold ILS or insurer-backed products, mark them for review.
2. Next 90 days: Engage the insurer (or fund manager) for details on any new gold or commodity allocations. Request custody confirmations and derivative schedules if applicable.
3. Next 180 days: Re-run stress tests including scenarios where gold rallies during claims stress. Reprice credit exposures or rebalance portfolios based on findings.

Closing perspective

AM Best’s upgrade of Michigan Millers Mutual to A+/aa- is more than a headline — it’s an event that changes the economic calculus inside insurer balance sheets. For investors with exposure to insurance-linked products, the practical implication is to stop treating insurers as static black boxes. Instead, monitor ratings actions, reinsurance ties and filings, and treat upgrades as potential triggers for portfolio re-evaluation, particularly around tactical allocations to gold ETFs or other inflation hedges.

As insurers adapt to 2026’s rate and inflation environment, improved creditworthiness can enable modest, but meaningful, shifts toward liquid gold exposure — and that subtle change should be on every institutional investor’s radar.

Call to action

Don’t wait for filings to drift into stale data. Subscribe to our institutional alerts for AM Best actions, download our insurer due-diligence checklist, or contact our research desk for a custom review of insurer-linked exposure in your portfolios.

Related Reading

• Recharge vs. Traditional Hot-Water Bottles: Which Offers the Best Value This Winter?
• From Folk Song to Heart: Using BTS’s Reflective Album Themes in Group Reunion Meditations
• Make a Mini Cocktail Kit for Your Next Road Trip (and How to Pack It)
• Operational Playbook for Windows Update Failures: Detect, Rollback, and Prevent
• Scent & Sensation: How Aromatic Science Could Help Curate Olive Oil Fragrance Pairings for Food and Beauty